The mindmap is a visual guide to understanding the interconnected forces shaping our world — from climate change and AI-driven disinformation to the deeper evolutionary shift in human consciousness. It helps you see beyond daily crises to recognize the larger patterns driving global transformation. Think of it as a "cheat sheet" for navigating the next decade. The mindmap has links to a research database with more than 3,000 peer-reviewed papers and public policy documents. The mindmap is the ideal tool for the intellectually curious.
The book is a gripping novel that helps with understanding the interplay between forces shaping our world. It is a "faction" - a mix between fact and fiction. The same research database that backs the mindmap informed the writing of the book. However, the book is ideal for those who aren't interested or don't have the time to delve into all of the copious footnotes that come with the mindmap. The narrative format can help us embrace the complexity of life. It enables us to grasp a thread of our experience and follow it toward profound truths.
By 2030, systemic pressures — economic, ecological, and technological — will force a reckoning. A global currency reset is likely, and how we respond will determine whether we double down on outdated systems (old school thinking) or transition to collaborative, regenerative models (emergent thinking). This isn’t speculation — it’s the culmination of centuries-old societal cycles, backed by public statements made by many global institutions and world leaders.
On the surface, 2030 might seem like just the start of another decade. But if you look closely at the news, policy shifts, and economic signals, you’ll notice a convergence of trends — climate policy, digital currencies, AI-driven influence, and global governance reforms — all pointing toward a major reset in how society, money, and power are organized. In addition, a number of global institutions (World Bank, UN, WEF, etc.) have publicly declared 2030 as a date for a reset. The “deadline” is not about a single event, but about the culmination of changes already underway, many of which have been in place for a number of decades. Worth noting is that the last Great Depression commenced with "Black Thursday" on October 24, 1929, almost 100 years ago. That reset moment led to the 1930s, a decade of severe economic hardship during which President Franklin Roosevelt introduced reforms to the momentary system. In other words, we have historical examples of what is likely to occur.
Consciousness is our ability to be aware — of ourselves, our choices, and the world around us. In times of rapid change and uncertainty, this awareness becomes crucial. When we raise our consciousness, we see beyond automatic habits and inherited beliefs, and we become more able to notice the bigger patterns shaping our lives — not just the daily headlines or emotional reactions. At this pivotal moment in history, heightened consciousness helps us recognize the end of one era and the emergence of another. It allows us to step back from fear and distraction, make wiser decisions, and participate more fully in shaping a future that aligns with our deepest values and collective well-being. In short, consciousness is what enables us to move from reacting to circumstances, to intentionally creating what comes next.
Powerful groups — both global institutions and financial elites — use AI-driven social media mis-, dis-, and malinformation campaigns to keep us fixated on surface-level conflicts (personalities, climate debates, culture wars, global conflicts, etc.) These distractions prevent us from noticing the deeper restructuring of money, power, and governance happening behind the scenes. What's important to know is that this behavior is normal and to be expected during the final phases of any empire.
A new global monetary system has been announced by a number of groups like the WEF, IMF, and UN. This has happened before in history, for example the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1945 after the Second World War. Monetary resets are framed as a solution to economic instability. However, accepting the coming reset without scrutiny could mean surrendering autonomy to centralized systems. The choice isn’t just about money — it’s a vote for whether we prioritize control or collaboration.
The signs are everywhere if you know how to spot them. Governments and global institutions are openly discussing new economic models, digital currencies, and “Great Reset” initiatives. At the same time, AI-powered campaigns shape public opinion, often nudging us toward accepting sweeping changes as inevitable. These aren’t hidden conspiracies — they’re unfolding in public, but often lost in the noise of daily headlines.
The term “Great Reset” has attracted conspiracy theories, but the actual initiative is a real, publicly discussed agenda from global organizations like the World Economic Forum. While some claims are exaggerated, the fact remains: powerful actors are using crises as opportunities to reshape economies, governance, and even the nature of money. The real question is whether we’re paying attention to how these changes affect our autonomy and future choices.
These are symptoms, not the root cause. The real challenge is the outdated "operating system" driving society — one that prioritizes growth over balance. While there have been many groups attempting to address symptoms, very little progress has been made. Instead, there is an emerging form of consciousness that offers a framework to address all these issues by redesigning systems at their core.
Your daily choices — where you spend money, how you engage online, what communities you support — are votes for the future. Small acts of collaboration (e.g., joining a mutual aid group) strengthen the emergent forms of thinking. As the saying goes: "Drop by drop, a river forms." The most meaningful thing you can do is educate yourself about what the coming monetary reset will mean to the human species so that you can make an informed decision when the time comes.
Yes — for systems built on extraction and hierarchy, which the Western system is. There have been 26 well-documented historical cases of collapse. All known class-based empires have collapsed, without exception. So, collapse is inevitable. The only unknown is the precise timing of when it will happen. A monetary reset is an attempt by the elite class during the late stages of an empire to avoid the collapse and to further concentrate wealth. The efforts rarely succeed. But collapse isn’t the end; it’s a transition to whatever comes next. Our calling — if we wish — is to build the "next system" now, so the transition leads to renewal, not chaos.
For many, daily life may appear unchanged. But beneath the surface, foundational systems — currency, governance, information, and even the way we work — are being quietly restructured. Those who learn to “read between the lines” can spot these shifts early and make wiser, more intentional decisions about their future.
Learn: Study regenerative systems (e.g., circular economies, bioregionalism).
Connect: Join or create local resilience networks (food co-ops, skill-sharing groups).
Opt out: Reduce dependence on centralized systems (e.g., use community currencies).
Reflect: Meditate on your role in humanity’s evolutionary leap.
Skepticism is healthy. But this isn’t about doom — it’s about pattern recognition. Throughout history, major societal shifts have been preceded by periods of confusion, distraction, and rapid technological change. Today, we’re seeing a unique convergence: economic, technological, and political systems are all being reimagined at once. If you read between the lines, you’ll see the groundwork for a new global order being laid right now. What makes this time different is that a new emerging form of consciousness and thinking makes a different outcome not only a possibility, but highly likely.
The most important changes rarely make the front page until they’re already set in motion. By the time headlines catch up, the window for meaningful choice may have closed. That’s why developing the skill to spot patterns and ask deeper questions is more important than ever.
The risk isn’t just missing out on trends — it’s being swept along by decisions made for you, not by you. The coming years will present a choice: accept new systems and controls by default, or step back, connect the dots, and decide for yourself what kind of future you want to help create.
The network effect problem in mutual aid credit currencies is classic: they're only valuable when enough people use them, but people won't use them until they're already valuable. This creates a chicken-and-egg adoption challenge that has historically limited the success of local currencies and mutual aid credit systems.
- Individual adoption requires confidence that others will also adopt
- Merchants won't accept until customers use it
- Customers won't use it until merchants accept it
- Without critical mass, the system fails to provide real utility
- Past local currency experiments often failed due to insufficient adoption infrastructure
MMACs solve the network effect by creating the community infrastructure and institutional legitimacy (municipalities) that enables successful mutual aid credit currency adoption.
For an historical precedent, consider the Certified Compensation Bills, commonly referred to as Stamp Scrip or Freigeld, which were a form of local currency issued in Wörgl, Austria, during the Great Depression in 1932. For a current example, we refer to the Mumbuca in Maricá, Brazil.
MMAC is not a currency; it's a social technology. While we've studied successful local currencies, MMACs are specifically designed for the 2026-2028 transition period when traditional monetary systems may face stress, creating an opportunity for wide-scale adoption of alternatives. We're developing hybrid approaches that can scale municipally and interconnect bioregionally.
No, MMACs are fundamentally different from environmental credit systems. While carbon and biodiversity credits are tradeable instruments that represent specific environmental outcomes (like carbon sequestered or habitat preserved), MMACs are cities, towns, and communities that have transformed their ways of organizing economic relationships from models of extraction to models of regeneration.
That said, there are interesting potential intersections we're exploring:
Local Environmental Integration: MMACs could potentially incorporate environmental stewardship into their value systems - for example, rewarding community members for local conservation work, sustainable practices, or participation in community resilience projects.
Complementary Systems: Communities might use both environmental credit programs AND mutual aid currencies, where environmental credits generate external revenue that helps back or stabilize the MMAC.
Measurement Frameworks: Some of the community impact measurement approaches used in environmental credit systems could inform how we track MMAC effectiveness for community resilience and economic circulation.
The key difference is purpose: environmental credits are designed to create markets for specific ecological outcomes, while MMACs are designed to strengthen local economic networks and community mutual aid capacity. MMACs focus on community self-reliance and local value circulation rather than creating tradeable assets for external markets.
No, though both approaches recognize the importance of place-based economic systems. Bioregional Financing Facilities are investment mechanisms designed to channel capital toward regenerative projects within specific bioregions - essentially creating regional funding pools for ecological restoration and sustainable development initiatives.
MMACs recognize and celebrate the structure of the human settlement, even when it spans multiple bioregions.
Key Differences:
Scale: BFFs typically operate at bioregional scale (watersheds, ecoregions), while MMACs focus on municipal and city scales
Function: BFFs are financing mechanisms for projects; MMACs are places of human settlement linked to the institutional validity offered by the municipality
Capital Flow: BFFs direct external investment capital into regions; MMACs circulate value that's already within the city or community
Timeline: BFFs fund specific projects with defined outcomes; MMACs facilitate ongoing regenerative economic relationships
Potential Synergies We're Exploring:
Complementary Systems: A bioregion might use BFFs to finance infrastructure projects while denizens of MMACs facilitate and enable regenerative projects while maintaining ongoing local exchange and mutual aid
Governance Alignment: Both approaches emphasize bioregional thinking and community self-determination
Regenerative Integration: Denizens of MMACs incorporate regenerative activities that align with BFF-funded projects
Geographic Relationship: Multiple municipalities within a bioregion might each have their own MMAC while participating in shared BFF initiatives - creating nested systems of local exchange within broader regenerative financing frameworks.
The frameworks could be highly complementary, with BFFs providing capital for regenerative infrastructure and MMACs enabling ongoing community economic resilience within those bioregional contexts.
Not necessarily. We're exploring multiple technical approaches including blockchain, but also simple digital platforms and even paper-based systems. The technology will follow community needs, not drive them.
We're building it together. While there are existing examples of community currencies and mutual aid systems, the specific MMAC framework is being developed collaboratively by this pioneer network. You're joining to help create and test approaches, not to receive a finished product.
You'll receive access to a collaborative development process, direct input into framework creation, connections with fellow practitioners, and lifetime access to resources we build together. This is for people who want to help shape solutions, not just receive them.
The coming Global Currency Reset will take place some time between now and 2030 (as publicly announced by major global institutions like the WEF, IMF, BIS, and UN). It is the inevitable outcome of the convergence of multiple global crises (economic, technological, environmental, political) and the predictable rise of a Power Elite class during the late stages of an empire. You can learn more by exploring the mindmap available at https://2030.michaelhaupt.com/mm.
This invitation is primarily for individuals, though we recognize many participants will bring organizational affiliations and expertise.
Why Individual Focus: The collaborative framework development we're undertaking requires the kind of adaptive thinking, creative problem-solving, and willingness to challenge assumptions that typically emerges from individual engagement rather than organizational representation. Organizations often operate within established frameworks and consensus positions that can limit the innovative thinking needed for pioneer work.
Individual Benefits:
Intellectual Freedom: You can explore ideas and approaches without organizational constraints or approval processes
Direct Relationship Building: Personal connections with fellow practitioners create stronger collaborative foundations
Adaptive Learning: Individual participants can pivot and evolve their thinking as the framework develops
Authentic Contribution: Your unique perspective and experience can contribute fully without organizational filtering
Organizational Connection: We absolutely welcome and expect that many Founding Members will bring valuable organizational experience and may eventually engage their organizations in MMAC implementation. However, the initial framework development benefits most from individuals who can think independently and contribute their full expertise.
Practical Approach: Join as an individual first. As frameworks develop and prove valuable, you'll be well-positioned to bridge between the network and any organizations you're connected with. Many successful community initiatives begin with committed individuals who later engage their institutional relationships.
Organizations can certainly sponsor individual participation or cover membership costs, but the collaborative seat belongs to the individual practitioner.
We understand that joining a pioneering initiative involves some uncertainty, and we want you to feel confident in your decision.
Full Refund Policy: You can receive a complete refund of your Founding Member payment if you decide the network isn't the right fit for you, provided you:
1. Request the refund within 7 days of attending the Essentials Intensive
2. Have not yet registered on the online collaboration platform
Why This Policy: Once members begin engaging on the collaboration platform, they gain access to ongoing network discussions, strategic frameworks under development, and connection details of other members. To protect the integrity and confidentiality of our collaborative work, we need to limit access to committed participants.
What This Means:
- Attend the first intensive and evaluate whether the approach resonates with you
- Take time to consider whether you want to commit to the collaborative development process, including watching the recording and accessing the supporting material sent after the intensive
- If it's not the right fit, simply request your refund before joining the platform
- If you do join the platform, you're committing to the collaborative journey as a Founding Member
Our Commitment: We want engaged, committed members rather than reluctant participants. This policy allows you to make an informed decision while protecting the trust and openness that makes collaborative framework development possible.
How to Request Refund: Simply email us within 7 days of the Intensive if you decide not to continue. No lengthy explanations needed - we understand that pioneering work isn't for everyone. The email address is prominently displayed in the footer of every page on our website.
The initial workshop is 2 hours. Ongoing participation is self-directed - you choose your level of engagement in framework development, pilot projects, and network activities. Some members may contribute a few hours monthly, others may lead major initiatives.
No. The network benefits from diverse expertise - policy researchers, technical developers, economists, and organizers all contribute differently. Some will pilot implementations, others will develop frameworks, create educational materials, or provide strategic guidance.
Excellent! We want to learn from and build upon existing work, especially currency technologies. The network aims to connect isolated efforts and develop more robust, institutionally-backed interconnected approaches for the transition period.
Absolutely. While some regulatory frameworks may be US/Canada-focused initially, the principles and many approaches are globally applicable. International perspectives strengthen the framework development.
The network convener, Michael Haupt, is involved with early efforts in South Africa.
We're developing a spectrum of options from simple digital platforms to more complex blockchain solutions. The goal is to have turnkey options for different community contexts and technical capabilities.
This is one of our key development areas. We're exploring hybrid approaches that allow MMACs to complement rather than replace conventional currency systems, with legal pathways for conversion and integration.
Regional interconnection is a priority. We're developing frameworks that allow MMACs to be locally customized while maintaining compatibility for inter-municipal trade and collaboration.
The intention is to work with legal and accounting experts to develop compliant approaches for MMAC transactions, including tax reporting and business accounting integration.
Most community currency approaches operate legally within existing frameworks when properly structured. We're developing compliance pathways and working with legal experts to ensure MMAC designs meet regulatory requirements.
These are key considerations in our framework development. We're creating approaches that provide appropriate transparency while maintaining community privacy and autonomy.
Careful legal structuring is essential. We're developing MMAC models that function as community exchange systems rather than investment vehicles, working within established legal precedents for local currencies.
This is a critical question we intend addressing through legal research and insurance considerations. Part of our framework development includes risk mitigation strategies for municipal partners.
We're developing economic governance mechanisms including backing ratios, velocity controls, and community oversight structures. This draws from successful local currency models while addressing transition-period challenges.
Value stability comes from community acceptance, utility for local transactions, and various backing mechanisms we're developing - from local business acceptance to municipal service payments to asset backing.
We're exploring sustainable funding models including transaction fees, membership contributions, municipal support, and service revenues. Different communities may use different approaches.
Rather than a single business model, we're developing frameworks that communities can adapt. Some may be fully municipally funded, others may use cooperative models, and some may employ social enterprise approaches.
Multiple monetary system stresses are converging - central bank digital currencies, banking system changes, and geopolitical monetary shifts. This creates both challenges and opportunities for community-level alternatives.
Strong local economic networks and mutual aid systems benefit communities regardless of broader monetary changes. MMACs provide resilience value even if major system disruption doesn't occur.
While we anticipate 2026-2028 as optimal implementation timing, community preparation and framework development need to begin now. Building trust and legal pathways takes time.
The framework development approach allows for flexible timing. Early pilots provide learning opportunities, while robust frameworks enable rapid deployment when conditions are optimal.
We're developing collaborative governance structures that give Founding Members significant input into framework development while maintaining effective decision-making processes that favor consent rather than consensus. Unlike consensus, which requires everyone's agreement, consent focuses on the absence of objections that would prevent achieving shared goals.
Our intention is to create open-source frameworks that benefit communities broadly while recognizing individual and collaborative contributions appropriately.
Founding Member diversity and transparent governance structures are key safeguards. We're building in checks and balances from the beginning rather than adding them later.
We expect healthy debate and diverse approaches. The goal is developing multiple compatible frameworks rather than enforcing a single model.
Communication happens through multiple channels - online platform discussions, regular video calls, working group meetings, and periodic in-person gatherings as the network grows.
We anticipate regional organizing as the network grows, with Founding Members potentially leading local clusters based on geographic proximity or shared interests.
We've selected Hylo as our collaboration platform since it balances accessibility, security, and functionality. Additionally, Hylo has established a healthy presence within the bioregional movement, which is closely linked to municipalities.
Clear agreements about information sharing and appropriate transparency help balance open collaboration with legitimate privacy and competitive concerns.
Founding Members retain access to resources developed during their participation. The collaborative model means your contributions continue benefiting the community.
Annual Members lose access to the network at the end of their subscription period.
We're studying why previous efforts struggled and designing specifically for the transition window ahead. The combination of timing, municipal focus, and collaborative development addresses common scaling barriers.
Our analysis draws from central bank communications, geopolitical monetary developments, and historical transition patterns. We'll share our research framework with Founding Members for collaborative assessment.
LETS provide valuable lessons, but MMACs are designed for different conditions - municipal scale, digital integration, regulatory compliance, and transition-period deployment. We're building on LETS wisdom while addressing different challenges.
Founding Member diversity, external advisory input, and structured dissent processes help maintain critical thinking. We want constructive challenge, not consensus for its own sake.
NEXUS 2030 reveals how multiple global crises are converging with planned institutional and monetary changes around the 2030 timeline.
We can't stop this reset, but we can shape it. Using economic Jiu-Jitsu, we can turn the system's momentum against itself.
NEXUS 2030 is a Call to Arms to transform inevitable disruption into conscious evolution.
COOKIES: I detest cookie notifications, so you won't find one here. I keep things to a minimum, but I do use cookie crumbs for an email newsletter and Google Analytics. Feel free to get in touch if you have questions!
© Copyright 2025 - Michael Haupt & Associates. All Rights Reserved.